Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 September 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 27[edit]

Template:UN region[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Data templates previously used by Template:Flaglist+link that have become unused after it was deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LGBT rights summary[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 5. Izno (talk) 03:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2009-2010 flu pandemic table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 5. Izno (talk) 03:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 Southeast Asian Games men's basketball game 1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 5. Izno (talk) 03:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Too many photos[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Technical redirect[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a hatnote template that isn't useful for navigation. Its only current use - on Dmitry - does not aid navigation in any way. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The text of this hatnote is so mangled it is incomprehensible. The single use of this makes absolutely no sense - Dmitriy redirects to Dmitry because it's an alternate spelling of the same word, it has nothing to do with technical restrictions in the mediawiki software. They previously had the hatnote referring to Dmítriy, which a) doesn't exist and b) also has no technical issues surrounding it - an article could be placed at that title if we wanted to. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boeing 737 MAX orders and deliveries[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NotRef[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"This guidance does not restrict linking to websites that are being used as sources to provide content in articles." This description doesn't make any sense as that is what citing sources or at least in part of what citing sources in articles already is. If anything, this template is kind of mimicking the vast number of citation templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Given its basically exclusive use as documentation for Help:CS1 templates, I think, on inclusion in Template:Citation Style documentation/registration, this looks like it should just be substed into that page. Trappist the monk? --Izno (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that the salient point here has already been voiced: This description doesn't make any sense. When this text was added to the cs1|2 documentation, I did not contest the addition because I didn't want to enter into combat and drama with the editor who created the template. I am glad to see this TfD and will be happy to see the template (and its content) go away.
    Trappist the monk (talk) 17:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Campaignbox Yemeni Crisis[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not really that useful of a template. The articles on the impact and disease outbreaks sections on the template do not have the template in their respective articles. It’s not really that useful as a sidebar. Most of these articles are either on Template:Campaignbox Yemeni Revolution or Yemeni Civil War (2014–present) Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose I don't think outright deletion is the solution here. What I would suggest is to add relevant articles and remove any unrelated links from this sidebar template. Revision should be done first before suggesting a Tfd. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).