User talk:Yusuf Asar Yathar

March 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sharhabil Yaqaf, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. skarz (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, please carefully review Wikipedia's policy requiring the use of reliable sources: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Information involving historical mosques, for example, should be based on reputable publications written by academic historians and archeologists, not news websites, magazines, or other web sources. R Prazeres (talk) 14:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is extremely unfair that the edit to Al Najashi Mosque was reverted, honestly. The previous sources weren't much different, and there were sources with stronger evidence to support the claims. Couldn't you at least just remove the questionable sources and just put "citation needed" to the new content?? Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 15:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not unfair at all, this is an encyclopedia that everybody can read and the expectation is that articles should always be improving and becoming more reliable, not less. It's better to inform you of these issues as soon as possible, rather than let you make edits that are likely be reverted or tagged at a later time. There is no reason to add new content only to then tag it as unsourced; we generally only do that to old content sometimes to give someone the chance to fix it if possible (and if it doesn't get fixed, it gets removed eventually).

If you want to add content about the mosque's recent history which can be verified through relevant news sources, that's fine, but its origins and older history need scholarly sources, as this is the domain of professional historians and archeologists. R Prazeres (talk) 15:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mashhad al-Tabataba has been accepted[edit]

Mashhad al-Tabataba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBritinator (talk) 02:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for letting me know. Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 08:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Hamra Mosque (Kufa) has been accepted[edit]

Al-Hamra Mosque (Kufa), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

14 novembre (talk) 15:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you! Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amr ibn al-As Mosque (Damietta) has been accepted[edit]

Amr ibn al-As Mosque (Damietta), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 06:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishr al-Marisi (March 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bishr al-Marisi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yusuf Asar Yathar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidi Zouk Tomb has been accepted[edit]

Sidi Zouk Tomb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahmud Shukri al-Alusi (March 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mahmud Shukri al-Alusi instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahmud Shukri al-Alusi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi (March 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shaykh Rajab Mosque (March 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Shaykh Rajab Mosque instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shaykh Rajab Mosque and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginary history of Egypt moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Imaginary history of Egypt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad Bahjat Athari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Quduri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sumyafa Ashwa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greek and Syriac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]